> What's being debated is whether granting a
> domain name to the most cashed-up player is a fairer system than
> granting it under some other criteria, such as:
>
>  - the one who has a "stronger" right to the name, or
>  - the one who asked for the name first, or
>  - the one who can make better use of the name.

If anyone can propose a workable system to determine between multiple
contenders:

* which one has a "stronger" right to the name

or

* which one can make better use of the name

please provide the details of such a system to the list server.


If there isn't such a system then its kinda pointless suggesting them as
options.



Regards, Mark