Hi Chris, Quoting Chris Lin on Wednesday January 16, 2002: | Eighteen months ago they decided to develop a | website and contacted a specialist who informed them that ?widgets.com.au? | was available for purchase and would make an excellent domain name. After | giving the developer the go-ahead they received the bad news that after | they applied the domain name ?widgets.com.au? had been placed on the list | of GENERIC names and was no longer available. The so-called "specialist" would be ill-advised in telling their customer that a generic was available for purchase in the first place. | Organising the disposal so that Business 1, the company with the deepest | pockets, can buy it is seen as the ?fairest way? to dispose of | ?widgets.com.au?. | What do you think? Thanks for your hypothetical, but how do you propose would be a fairer way to release the generic domains? In any system there will be winners and losers, but what would be a way that you think would be the most satisfactory? kimReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC