Adrian, it's more like having to re-sit your licence every two years, but with the added risk of doing so with a whole new set of road rules (policy) with which to conform. Apropos of having to conform to new policy - what happens if, for example, I have changed my company name in the meantime, but have continued to build brand awareness and value around a domain name that was derived from my original company name. This, by the way, is a real scenario that I face. Am I then penalised with forfeiting my valid domain, possibly to somebody who has taken up my old company name, now lapsed, simply because it no longer conforms to policy? I, too, sense some lack of awareness of coal-face realities in the policy as I presently understand it. Ron Stark -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Stephan [mailto:akstephan§ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 4:34 PM To: dns§auda.org.au Subject: RE: [DNS] Domain Name Management and renewal process I guess this is like having a driver's license that you have to resit every two years to a new set of rules. Hmmm, interesting concept. Who makes the money or am I being too cynical here? I thought there were established precedences used by the Courts. A point system is used for something as sensitive as immigration. Why can't we have such a transparent system here. It takes years to establish an identity for a business and to have this sort of process is just simply ridiculous and shows a complete lack of understanding, in my opinion. So, I assume I am not with the flow. Rgds Adrian =========================================== Adrian Stephan (Managing Director) Logistics Pty Ltd POB 5068 PINEWOOD VIC 3149 Ph: +61 (0)3 9888 2366 Fx: +61 (0)3 9888 2377 akstephan§ozemail.com.au adrian.stephan§logistic.com.au www.logistic.com.au =========================================== -----Original Message----- From: Nick Andrew [mailto:nick§zeta.org.au] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 14:42 PM To: dns§auda.org.au Subject: Re: [DNS] Domain Name Management and renewal process On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:54:48AM +1100, Ron Stark wrote: > Andrew, I didn't know that was "the name of the game". I thought the game > was to web-enable those consumers that don't already have a domain name / > web presence, i.e. growth. Registering a domain name has been trivial for years, and is no inhibitor to growth. "All the good ones are already taken" ... as some wise person said, and this on the other hand is obviously an inhibitor to the rich and powerful getting the domain name they want. It is important to protect the rights of large corporations to hold all domain names (however many is irrelevant) which could in any way be associated with the corporation (like sucks domains, and misspellings, and simple somebody-else-got-it-first). After all, a good domain name can represent large revenue and/or publicity to a corporation; quashing the registrations of nobodies who aren't even making any money from their domain name makes simple economic sense. > In your recycling "game", just how do you propose to measure the strength / > weakness of any claim? Wealth? Size of organisation? First in? Domicile? > Temporary inaction? Arbitrary subjectivity? Fame? It's already happening, and I didn't make the policy. Germany has decided that Shell Corporation has more right to the name www.shell.de than some guy whose surname is Shell, whose only claim to fame is that he registered the name first. Closer to home - as the article I was following up queried - soon domains will be able to be taken from their registrants if the registrant no longer qualifies for that domain according to the policy of the day. Why should a domain be forcibly taken away from its original registrant but to be reallocated to somebody else! Prior use, well-known-services, email, privacy - all are irrelevant to the industry of recycling domain names. Nick. -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 327 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed. -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 327 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed. -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 327 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.Received on Wed Nov 28 2001 - 06:24:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC