Andrew, I didn't know that was "the name of the game".  I thought the game
was to web-enable those consumers that don't already have a domain name /
web presence, i.e. growth.

In your recycling "game", just how do you propose to measure the strength /
weakness of any claim?  Wealth?  Size of organisation?  First in?  Domicile?
Temporary inaction?  Arbitrary subjectivity?  Fame?


Ron Stark
Business Park Pty Ltd
mail: ronstark§businesspark.com.au
tel: +61 (0)3 9592 6895   fax: +61 (0)3 9591 0729
mob: +61 (0)41 812 9922



-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Andrew [mailto:nick§zeta.org.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 9:41 AM
To: dns§auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] Domain Name Management and renewal process


On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:40:48AM +1100, Adrian Stephan wrote:
> Do I understand this right.  Each time a domain name comes up for
> renewal it
> will have to be tested against the policy and if it fails it will be
> rejected.

That's right - after all, nobody cares if email addressed to the
previous users of the domain name is delivered to a later registrant,
nor that there may be well-known services identified on that domain
name. Get with the flow Adrian - the name of the game in 2001 is
ensuring that domain names are efficiently recycled, and ensuring
that parties with a stronger claim to a domain name displace parties
with a weaker claim.

www.shell.de - just say NO

Nick.

--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 328 subscribers. 
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.

--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 328 subscribers. 
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.