Hello Mark, > > 1. 'At any time in the past, (or at the present time), could > Melbourne IT's > authorised re-sellers access the expiry dates of domain names > for which they > were not the contact?' Yes, in the past resellers could access information about a domain name which included both the creation date and the expiry date. In May 2001 Melbourne IT implemented a policy and systems change requiring all expiry dates be obtained with a registry key. This was introduced to stop unauthorised access and improve security. All Resellers were advised and the change was made public through the media. In September 2001, we also removed access to the creation date (from which the expiry date is often deduced). > > 2. 'At any time in the past, (or at the present time), could > Melbourne IT's > authorised re-sellers access the address details in bulk > (i.e. download the > database or do unrestricted queries of the database to > collate the data) of > domain names for which they were not the contact?' > As far as I am aware, bulk access to the data has never been provided. At this stage the Creation Date available on AUNIC can allow an organisation to deduce the expiry date. I recommend that the creation date be removed from the standard on-line query on AUNIC. Where there is a legitimate reason (e.g a trademark attorney) for knowing the creation date of a domain name, this can be handled with a separate request to auDA (possibly with an administration fee associated with it to discourage data mining). In response to the general question of where resellers are obtaining their data, they can find the details of a domain name owner by sending single queries to either Melbourne IT or AUNIC. In the case of AUNIC they can deduce the expiry date from the creation date (although these are not always synchronized). Bulk information that was obtained last year via AUNIC, can at least give an organisation the list of domain names in existence at that time, and from there they can query the on-line databases to get more recent information. More recent security breaches in AUNIC data earlier this year, may have allowed a more recent copy of the bulk information. I am interested to know of cases where new domain names that have been created say since July 2001 are subject to the unsolicited offers of domain name registration. Organisations can also obtain information about the existence of domain names by searching for ".com.au" websites using search engines, or reviewing publications such as yellow pages etc. Once an organisation knows that a domain name exists, it can then query the AUNIC database to find details of the domain name registrant. In the case of resellers, they can also query the Melbourne IT database for the same WHOIS information, but won't have access to creation or expiry dates without the registry key. Basically it is not hard to obtain sufficient information from a range of on-line databases to launch unsolicited email, fax, telephone etc campaigns. The restriction of bulk data can make it more difficult (ie the databases need to be data mined over time), but doesn't in the end stop the practice. At present the prices charged by those that use these types of approaches and the number of people that respond to these approaches, more than covers the costs of sending lots of notices. We can at least limit access to creation and expiry information. Regards, Bruce Tonkin -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 319 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.Received on Thu Nov 22 2001 - 07:37:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC