Peter, yes I was aware of the scheduled meeting.  I simply wanted a prior
workshop on resellers' and consumer concerns and issues, so that we could
then go to that auDA meeting having already disposed of superfluous matters
that usually consume so much time.

If my experience is anything to go by, time constraints in the main meeting
will probably preclude much of the discussion that I believe will be
necessary, because the Code of Conduct will be but one agenda item among
many.  I thought I made that clear in our previous exchanges.

As a matter of interest, is the term "unilateral" appropriate for something
for which I clearly wanted general and public participation?

Meanwhile, thank you for your offer of support.


Ron Stark
Business Park Pty Ltd
mail: ronstark§businesspark.com.au
tel: +61 (0)3 9592 6895   fax: +61 (0)3 9591 0729
mob: +61 (0)41 812 9922

Board Candidate - Supply Class



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter [mailto:peter§instra.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2001 8:16 PM
To: dns§auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] Dissent on process


Ron

Sorry - but I thought you were aware that auDA is actually holding public 
meetings in December - and whether you want to believe it or not .....it is 
likely to be as representative as any meeting you could assemble.

Personally I believe that it is better if we hold the meetings with auDA's 
blessing - I am not unhappy about the registrar agreement  (even though I 
think it is repressive - and in this belief  acknowledge that my interest 
is as a prospective registrar and not a user.)... I have every reason to 
believe they listened to public comment about it.

Please whip up support for your arguments at the December public meeting 
and you will have my support to be heard - but with your unilateral meeting 
having failed to materialize I believe this might be the best forum to air 
your arguments

Peter Dean
Chairman - The Instra Group
Candidate for the Board - Supply Class



At 07:23 AM 11/14/01 +1100, you wrote:
>I find the current "debate" on process somewhat surprising.  Every
>participant had adequate opportunity to comment on - even to change - the
>tendering process and domain management process to which some objecting.
So
>why should there be complaints now, and debate on policy now, when the
>opportunity that was given has passed and not been taken up?
>
>It's the prospect of this very type of kafuffle that led me to call for
>members and resellers to workshop the Code of Conduct with which we'll all
>be bound.  It's the same inaction that's resulted in no such meeting being
>arranged.  And I fear that when resellers are required to comply with the
>Code of Conduct, or are called on to act within it to deal with rogues in
>the industry, there will be the same sense of "If only we'd done that when
>we had the chance."
>
>
>Ron Stark
>Business Park Pty Ltd
>mail: ronstark§businesspark.com.au
>tel: +61 (0)3 9592 6895   fax: +61 (0)3 9591 0729
>mob: +61 (0)41 812 9922
>
>Candidate for the Board - Supply Class
>
>--
>This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
>express permission of the author. 325 subscribers.
>Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
>Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.

--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 323 subscribers. 
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.

--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 323 subscribers. 
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.