Mr. Bloch, You wrote: There are people on this list that have a serious commitment to the continuing evolvement of DNS administration in Australia. There are some of us here who have been actively involved in DNS reform since the NOIE Working Group and before. There are issues that are important to the Internet in Australia and to Australia itself. Please try and take it seriously - this is not a group of your peers. > Your idea of dns reform is taking advantage of the industry by 'launching' the exciting and brilliant new domain name XXXX.au.com It is you who is making a mockery of this industry, not I. You wrote: I have refrained from replying to you because basically you have not proven yourself worth responding to. Your juvenile response below has no place on this list. Please try to control yourself for the benefit of all. > Is this a "God Complex" or grandiose delusions? All bow your heads and await approval of Mr. Bloch (.au.com emperor) You wrote: I do find it revealing, Harry, that of all people on this list, you chose to respond to my posting defensively - but then, its not exactly unexpected, is it? You stand exposed, Harry. Try and do yourself as little damage as you can. > You then went on to justify and defend your actions is the .com.au tender. As far as doing damage, I have never authorised any member of NetRegistry to discuss any financial activities (if any) between Web Access and your company. Harry -----Original Message----- From: larry§netregistry.au.com [mailto:larry§netregistry.au.com] Sent: Monday, 17 September 2001 6:19 PM To: dns§auda.org.au Subject: RE: [DNS] Undesirables on this list Harry There are people on this list that have a serious commitment to the continuing evolvement of DNS administration in Australia. There are some of us here who have been actively involved in DNS reform since the NOIE Working Group and before. There are issues that are important to the Internet in Australia and to Australia itself. Please try and take it seriously - this is not a group of your peers. I have refrained from replying to you because basically you have not proven yourself worth responding to. Your juvenile response below has no place on this list. Please try to control yourself for the benefit of all. I do find it revealing, Harry, that of all people on this list, you chose to respond to my posting defensively - but then, its not exactly unexpected, is it? You stand exposed, Harry. Try and do yourself as little damage as you can. I think there is little point in taking you seriously - for my part you can say what you like, I will not be responding to anything you write from here on and I urge the rest of the list to make their own judgements and act accordingly. For the record and the benefit of the list: NetRegistry tendered in an open and accountable tender for the contract to host the AUNIC database. We did this in return for advertising on the AUNIC website. Our tender won, because we were astute enough to pitch it in a way that addressed AUDA's objectives and constraints. I'm sure that all who use this service recognise the vast improvement in service and performance since NetRegistry started providing this service. If anyone has an opinion on the suitability of this arrangement, I am more than happy to debate it off list. And Harry, thank you for finally settling your bill. Regards Larry Bloch Chief Executive Officer ____________________________________________ NetRegistry http://www.netregistry.au.com Tel: +61 2 9699 6099 | Fax: +61 2 9699 6088 PO Box 270 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia -----Original Message----- From: Harry Hoholis [mailto:webmaster§webaccess.com.au] Sent: Monday, 17 September 2001 17:35 To: dns§auda.org.au Subject: RE: [DNS] Undesirables on this list What are you afraid of Larry? List fears in space below: Harry -----Original Message----- From: larry§netregistry.au.com [mailto:larry§netregistry.au.com] Sent: Monday, 17 September 2001 5:36 PM To: dns§auda.org.au Subject: [DNS] Undesirables on this list All and Chris Recently an individual posting to this list was banned from posting due to inappropriate remarks and personal attacks. My question is this. Does the ban apply only to their false identity - or does it apply to the individual. The individual in question used the name Dominic Main (a NetRegistry domain administrator role account), a Start email address and admitted he posts to the list regularly under his real name. I find it distasteful to say the least that this individual is allowed to continue posting to this list, having already been kicked off. For those interested, its actually fairly easy to identify who this individual is, as one needs look only at who started becoming active soon after the pseudo Domenic Main was banned. My opinion is that the tone of the two postings leaves little to the imagination. NetRegistry has hard evidence as to the identity of the postings. In any event, it is my expectation that the ban applies not to the virtual moniker assumed by the individual, but in fact to that individual. Or are we to attribute the substance of an individual to an email address rather than to the person? Chris, can you respond to this? Regards Larry Bloch Chief Executive Officer ____________________________________________ NetRegistry http://www.netregistry.au.com Tel: +61 2 9699 6099 | Fax: +61 2 9699 6088 PO Box 270 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 336 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed. -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 336 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed. -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 336 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed. -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. 336 subscribers. Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.Received on Mon Sep 17 2001 - 09:06:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC