There are two sides to every story, both right and both wrong. The banner on AUNIC sucks - it is overbearing and may lead the less cluefull to believe there is a stronger relationship between AUNIC & NR. It has potential to drag away many of our customers. The "$100k" to set it up seems, to me, inflated. I co-lo servers on much more than 45/8 for only $8k a year... so if the rest is hardware, even with two systems and raid5 (where 0+1 would probably be better), NR needs to shop around a bit for their hardware. I offered to host AUNIC for only a small text link on only _some_ of the pages, and definately not the lookup pages. I was too late, NR had already closed the deal. I asked auda about it, Chris informed me it was a 12 month contract, but that (going from memory here) "that in 12 months auda would be so different it wouldn't matter" or words to that effect. I was also told, twice, that it was "extensively checked by our solicitors". wow, I'm impressed. I'm looking forward to those 12 months rolling around, and auda calling for competitive tenders from the industry, and seeing what turns up. I know I'll be bidding, and wont be using it to advertising a competing business. Cheers, Andrew.Received on Fri Jul 20 2001 - 07:19:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC