RE: [DNS] re-delegation of .au

RE: [DNS] re-delegation of .au

From: <dave§davehooper.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:40:18 +1000
I agree with the sentiments expressed here.

We need to ensure that all the processes are completely transparent. Regular
posting to the auDA site is surely not that difficult to manage.

Am I wrong again?

Dave.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cate Coorey [mailto:catecoorey&#167;bigpond.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2001 1:15 PM
To: dns&#167;waia.asn.au
Subject: [DNS] re-delegation of .au


Greg Watson said
>Cate,
>The auDA board fully supports the process that is being undertaken to
>effect the transfer of delegation for .au.

Generally, as I understand corporate rules such a comment would require
some evidence that the board has met, discussed and passed a resolution of
some sort. Do you mean to say "All members of the auDA board, representing
the various stake holder groups have been polled on the process being
undertaken and have voted to support it."
I am beginning to suspect not, such a pity as all the good work done by
auDA amounts to a hill of beans ( IMHO ) if this final process is not
undertaken with integrity, transparency and accountability. Surly the
appropriateness of any re-delegation would hinge on auDA's ability to give
confidence to the au Internet community that
it is able to "do a equitable, just, honest, and competent job". The
confusion (in my mind) re the process being followed is not aided by
absence of any information on the auDA web site. Having to rely on media
clips seems odd, not posting information until you have confirmation the
IANA has received the request lacks credibility since auDA has apparently
(according to the press) met with ICANN re the issue.

>  In view of this it is our intention to proceed with the redelegation as
> outlined by Chris.

Chris has done nothing to outline any process. He said a "formal process
was being followed" then declined outline it until he has had a chance
(oops, a second chance) to present it to the media.

Disappointed, but will be delighted to be proven wrong.

Respectfully yours,

Cate Coorey

--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 372 subscribers.
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167;auda.org.au to be removed.
Received on Thu Jun 07 2001 - 11:38:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC