G'day, There has been alot of discussion in the group about the rights and wrongs of acquiring domain names. What seems to have been neglected is the real purpose of domain names. This is for "end users" to locate information via the web. The success of the "end users" doing this will provide the real value to domain names. If there are alot of cyber squatting and descriptive domain names out there, the value of domain names will be diminished as end users are turned off. To ensure that the needs of end users are address, I would suggest that the auDA draft a "Users Guide" to DNS which explains how to use DNS to find the service / company they want. This should be workshopped until we have a scheme that will really meet the end user need. Some suggests: 1. No domain name should be able to registered where the name is a trade mark (no maker the punctuation) by a party other than the trade mark holder. This is regardless of whether the trade mark holder has registered a domain name. 2. High level domains that represent trade mark categories (or some morphing ) can be used to better target requests - eg coke.bev.au where bev is for beverages, holden.auto.au. One could argue that the .com.au domain should be phased out. 3. No descriptive domains should not be allowed except for directory services authorised by auDA. For example: cars.au should point to a directory service where car dealers and manufacturers can be listed. This can be refined geographically - cars.nsw.au, cars.sydney.nsw.au. Industry associations could run these directories or departments of finance or industry in the government space. The directory "portals" would need to be regulated in some way. (Trademarks can not be registered for descriptive names. The descriptions must be misspelt) 4. There should be a well known service "tree" for government and utility services - power.vic.au should be a directory of power utilities in Victoria. roads.nsw.au should point to RTA in NSW, roads.qld.au should point to Department Of Main Roads in Queensland. The "user guide" could be published and taught in schools. Note: The principle with trade marks is to ensure that there is not "confusion in the market place". In other words that a Holden is a Holden is a Holden if it is a car. There can be another Holden that is not a car that doesn't have to be General Motors Holden. But if its a car, Holden should refer to General Motors Holden. If it has to do with cars, the domains "gmh" and "holden" should be protected regardless of whether GMH has registered the domains. Although requiring a registered business name works part of the way to this, it is NOT equivalent. The trade mark principle should be apply to domain names. David Bernard Lead Architect IP Planning And Architecture Cable And Wireless Optus Phone: +61 2 9342 1203 Email: David.Bernard§cwo.com.auReceived on Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:24:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC