Hello, May I join your discussion for the first time. So far, I have been a quiet reader. As a person who administered and registered about 800-900 domain names world-wide, I think I have some knowledge to comment :) It is very intriguing that, like in all history books, every side finds a suitable date and measures time from it. What stops a person with a family name Brisbane (who can prove that 200-300 years ago his family name was exclusive to him) and ask for loyalties from Brisbane City Council? Or a person called McDonnalds to pull out some history books and prove that 1,000 years ago his family was a sole owner of the name? Or what about Sydney (or should I say Lord Sydney)? Maybe one day his ancestors come to us and ask us to pay for using his name. What a nonsense, isn't it? Rules should be simple (and the new proposal is correcting it): 1. Who rightfully manages to register a business or company name, has the privilege to register the same domain name as well. 2. If Brisbane City Council is a registered commercial organization, then they have right, like anyone else, to ask for brisbane.com.au. 3. Typically, Brisbane City is NOT a commercial entity so, if government accepts a registration of a business called Brisbane Ltd (or whatever) from another company, then they must be aware that domain names must follow the same logic. 4. The importance of Internet has become crucial for business, nobody is silly to register a business name without planning to take the same domain name. 5. So, if a registration of a company or business name is approved, there should be no obstacles in registering domain name of the same kind. I remember the case, several years back, when there was a little business name here in NSW called Baud. On their behalf, I tried to register baud.com.au and was declined because the name was too "generic". In the end, the company choose a very silly domain name, and because nobody could remember it, they went out of business (nobody visited their WWW pages, and so on). Who benefited? You can guess it :) I am looking forward to seeing the new proposals approved and in action as soon as possible and congratulate auda for taking steps to make changes. Best wishes, Dusan U. Baljevic, BSEE(First Class Honours) Corporate IT, Manager Mayne Ltd. http://www.matra.com.au/~dusan Phone: +61 2 9005 7847 0412 041 715 Facsimile: +61 2 9005 7846 -----Original Message----- From: James Liakos [mailto:James.Liakos§blackwoods.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 6:07 AM To: 'dns§auda.org.au' Subject: [DNS] FW: [DNS] Brisbane.com is blackwoods.com.au in the same boat ? So does that mean that our domain blackwoods.com.au might go to a town called Blackwoods even though we have had this domain for over a few years now ? James Liakos Network Administrator J. Blackwood & Son Limited -----Original Message----- From: Jon Lawrence [mailto:jon§inww.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2001 6:56 AM To: 'dns§auda.org.au' Subject: RE: [DNS] Brisbane.com WIPO awarded Barcelona.com to the Barcelona City Council in August... http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,17627,00.html -----Original Message----- From: stacy green [mailto:stacymoxham§yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2001 12:56 AM To: dns§auda.org.au Subject: [DNS] Brisbane.com How do The Brisbane City Council think they are going to get Brisbane.com? even WIPO could not be that pethetic. AuDomains.com has had this name listed for sale for ages. I read their comments on their web page and they don't seem to be too nice towards Cr Quinn. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. **********************************************************************Received on Wed Feb 07 2001 - 06:04:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC