Re: "What a joke!" (auDA Ltd AGM & new Board meeting) 7/12/00

Re: "What a joke!" (auDA Ltd AGM & new Board meeting) 7/12/00

From: Len Lindon <info§humanrights.com.au>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:45:18 +1100
Staley is on many boards. Eg Chairman of the TIO Council. Yep, the industry
ombudsman!

As to the why (your question below), got any thoughts?

> From: Jim Birch <jbirch&#167;multinode.com.au>
> Organization: Multinode Computing
> Reply-To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 13:01:15 +0800
> To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Cc: dns&#167;waia.asn.au
> Subject: Re: "What a joke!" (auDA Ltd AGM & new Board meeting) 7/12/00
> Resent-From: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 13:01:31 +0800
> 
> Thanks Len
> 
> I for one find it decidedly smelly.  We were told that the government wanted
> the
> internet naming authority to be a non-government industry-run organisation.
> Yet, now we have the Liberal Party's top "fixer" running the show (by
> "consensus.")  I wonder why?  When did Staley become an expert on the
> internet?
> It looks like we have a control without accountability operation run by Weasel
> and Smirk P/L rather than an industry body.  If the government wanted to own
> it
> (which is reasonable, IMHO) why didn't they just take it over honestly, and,
> be
> publicly accountable.
> 
> Jim Birch
> 
> Len Lindon wrote:
> 
>> ----------
>> From: Len Lindon <info&#167;humanrights.com.au>
>> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 12:52:03 +1100
>> To: <idno-discuss&#167;idno.org>
>> Cc: "matthew.healy" <matthew.healy&#167;accc.gov.au>, <kre§munnari.OZ.AU>,
>> <ceo&#167;auda.org.au>, <comments§auda.org.au>, <icann§icann.org>,
>> <comments&#167;icann.org>
>> Subject: ICANN breakup case / 39. .au domain new Chairman: "What a joke!"
>> (auDA Ltd AGM & new Board meeting) 7/12/00
>> 
>> "What a joke!"
>> 
>> Former Chairman of the Prime Minister Howards's Liberal Party, Tony Staley
>> is now the New Chairman of au. Domain Administration Corporation Limited.
>> 
>> Asked to ratify Mr Staley's appointment as a Director, the thirty Company
>> Members attending Tuesday's amicable AGM in Melbourne all laughed when the
>> proxies were read out-- 28 for, none against-- and Mr Staley commented:
>> "What a joke!" in a jovial tone. The Members present, having duly laughed as
>> expected, then voted unanimously by raising their right hand to ratify Mr
>> Staley's appointment.
>> 
>> The joke got even better at the first meeting of the new Board of Directors
>> the following day, Wednesday 6 December, when all agreed to make Mr Staley
>> the new Chairman of the Board. Technically, Mr Staley is sharing
>> chairmanship duties with previous Chairman Greg Watson under a co-chairing
>> deal worked out before the meeting. Uh-uh.
>> 
>> To really get the joke, you have to know that the Company Constitution
>> allows the elected Board Members to appoint two other Directors. And that
>> the Board two months ago (September 2000) duly chose to appoint Tony Staley
>> and Greg Sword.
>> 
>> Both Mr Watson and the AGM Notice described these Staley and Grew in
>> hilariously deadpan style as "independent". Upon a query from the only
>> longhaired male at the AGM as to how they could be described as independent,
>> Mr Watson replied that they were "independent of the domain name system".
>> 
>> So, there you have it. A non-elected director is now a new Chairman of the
>> Company. And this bravura display of political engineering is just the
>> beginning. Mr Staley has just twelve weeks before Prime Minister Howard
>> welcomes ICANN to Australia. Internet heavies from around the world will
>> gather at the Melbourne Exhibition Centre for a week of meetings and deals
>> from March 10 next year. The Prime Minister would be delighted to show the
>> world that the .au domain is of world standard and conduct a ceremony.
>> 
>> Two problems.
>> 
>> One, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is examining the
>> Notification alleging ICANN/auDA breaches of Australia's Trade Practices
>> Act. This Notification was made immediately following the ICANN meeting in
>> its home state of California in early November 2000. The ACCC is still
>> formulating its preliminary response. The new Board at auDA Ltd recieved
>> formal notice of the Notification at its first meeting on Wednesday in South
>> Melbourne. Most requested documents are now available on the web
>> at the Internet Law & Regulation forum under New > Jurisdiction at
>> http://internetlaw.pf.com/subscribers/html/ILRForum.asp
>> 
>> Two, the Howard Government does not actually have the legal authority over
>> much of the .au domain. Say what?
>> 
>> In his Chair's Report to the AGM on Tuesday, Mr Watson summarised key
>> achievments and ongoing activities for the period. On the key topic of
>> "Authority", Mr Watson said: "Authority is something I've been working very
>> hard to establish auDA as a credible alternative for managing domain names
>> in Australia...We have presented our report to the Government and the
>> indications are that we will be receiving Government endorsement in the next
>> few weeks... We're working closely with Robert Elz. Ultimately we have to
>> have the delegation transferred, it has to be done by ICANN. Ideally Robert
>> has to approve and we're working very hard to meet his comfort level and his
>> requirements. We believe a good understanding has been established."
>> 
>> Mr Watson noted that "finalising the .au delegation and satisfying Robert
>> that we are the right organisation to take over that role" was an ongoing
>> activity.
>> 
>> There were more non-suprises at the AGM when impoverished professor Peter
>> Gerrand was quick to second the motions in support of Staley and Crew.
>> Gerrand, recently retired from Melbourne IT, was also allowed to interrupt
>> Chairman Watson to correct him and Mr Watson then stated that he agreed with
>> him that Australia was a member of several ICANN boards and international
>> telecommunications committees.
>> 
>> The decisions made by 60 AGM voters (overwhelmingly white and male and
>> corporate types) have significant impact on all internet users in Australia.
>> 
>> Whether auDA Ltd is a corporation and thus possibly subject to the Trade
>> Practices Act, or whether it is a government body and thus possibly subject
>> to Administrative Law are questions the ACCC must be currently considering.
>> 
>> The ACCC might also pick up on the fact that new Chairman Staley would
>> certainly boost the confidence of two powerful stakeholders in this area--
>> the Howard Government and certain Big Corporate Players like Melbourne IT.
>> 
>> Just like the worldfamous Melbourne Cup horse race each November, some
>> locals punters are backing auDA Ltd to win the Australian domain name race
>> whilst other insiders point to Mr Elz, the current ICANN delegate of the .au
>> space, and the ACCC response as wildcards which even the legendary backroom
>> skills of Liberal Party fixer, Tony Staley, can not hobble.
>> 
>> Mr Staley was off to a flying start at the first board meeting-- out went
>> formal voting on motions, in came "consensus". Sounds great, but what's it
>> mean? Well, for one thing, as boardroom veteran Staley knows, it limits the
>> scope for legal challenges to voting and motions-- because there aren't any
>> in a formal challengeable sense. And, for another thing, the ICANN attempt
>> to co-opt the term "consensus" is seen by most participants as bogus or
>> "faux-consensus". The problems with the ICANN use and misuse of consensus
>> style decision making is the subject of a serious indepth study just
>> published in the Duke Law Journal (see extract below) and noted in  the
>> industry must-read icb mailout (see 12/5/00 ICBTollFreeNews.Com HEADS UP
>> HEADLINES).
>> 
>> China's sameday media statement asserting China's sovereignty over language
>> and domain names for Chinese citizens was not discussed publicly at auDA Ltd
>> this week.
>> (see China Claims Its Own Domain, Reuters 8:15 a.m. Dec. 4, 2000 PST
>> http://www.wirednews.com/news/politics/0,1283,40506,00.html
>> "HONG KONG -- A dispute between the United States and China over the control
>> of Chinese-scripted Internet addresses deepened on Monday as China
>> reiterated its claim over all Chinese language Internet domain names...")
>> 
>> Nor were the relevant and notorious statements in official US court
>> testimony by ICANN counsel and Vice-President Louis Touton :
>> 
>> -- "Although one of those factors is the wishes of the government of the
>> country involved, no foreign government �owns� its ccTLD or can order ICANN
>> or the Department of Commerce to take any actions with respect to a ccTLD."
>> (paragraph 19)
>> 
>> -- "As stated above, no country �owns� a ccTLD or has the rights to order
>> ICANN or the Department of Commerce to change the manner in which a ccTLD is
>> operated." (paragraph 20)
>> 
>> -- source:  US District Court, ES v ICANN, No. 4:00CV1785-DJS,
>> Declaration of Louis Touton, 11 November 2000, as reproduced at
>> http://www.geocities.com/gooda14/icann/Touton.htm
>> 
>> Touton and ICANN are currently considering a French request to clarify how
>> ICANN, a form of company not recognised in French law, would respond to the
>> possible use by US courts of French law to break the ICANN contract with the
>> French AFNIC. Looks like a busy Christmas season for Louis.
>> 
>> And of course no mention at the auDA AGM of AURSC or ORSC or the unconnected
>> or the undomained.
>> 
>> *****************************************
>> CONSENSUS reference:
>> 
>> Cited: 50 Duke L. J. 187
>> [*pg 187]
>> 
>> ICANN AND THE PROBLEM OF LEGITIMACY
>> 
>> JONATHAN WEINBERG�
>> 
>> ABSTRACT
>> INTRODUCTION
>> I. HOW WE GOT HERE
>> A.    Early History of the Internet
>> B.    Internet Addressing
>> C.    The Transition
>> D.    ICANN
>> II. THE PROBLEM OF LEGITIMACY
>> III. LEGITIMACY AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
>> IV. LEGITIMIZING ICANN
>> A.    The Techniques of Administrative Law
>> B.    The Techniques of Representation
>> C.    The Techniques of Consensus
>> 
>> Cited: 50 Duke L. J. 187
>> [*pg 187]
>> 
>> ICANN AND THE PROBLEM OF LEGITIMACY
>> 
>> JONATHAN WEINBERG�
>> 
>> ABSTRACT
>> INTRODUCTION
>> I. HOW WE GOT HERE
>> A.    Early History of the Internet
>> B.    Internet Addressing
>> C.    The Transition
>> D.    ICANN
>> II. THE PROBLEM OF LEGITIMACY
>> III. LEGITIMACY AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
>> IV. LEGITIMIZING ICANN
>> A.    The Techniques of Administrative Law
>> B.    The Techniques of Representation
>> C.    The Techniques of Consensus
>> 
>> ********************************************
>> DOCUMENT THIRTY-NINE TPA-ICANN/auDA: .au DOMAIN NEW CHAIRMAN "WHAT A JOKE!",
>> report on auDA Ltd Annual General Meeting and new Board first meeting,
>> Tuesday 5 December 2000 and Wednesday 6 December 2000, published 1.40am UTC
>> Thursday 7 December 2000
>> Author: Len Lindon, Barrister & Human Rights Defender.
>> 
>> --
>> This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
>> express permission of the author. 355 subscribers.
>> Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
>> Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167;auda.org.au to be removed.
> 
> 
> --
> This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
> express permission of the author. 357 subscribers.
> Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
> Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167;auda.org.au to be removed.
> 
Received on Thu Dec 07 2000 - 13:46:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC