On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Patrick Corliss wrote: > Most significantly, the report proposes anyone applying for a domain name > should first hold an associated trademark. > Does anyone know where to get hold of a copy of the report? The suggestion above is rather strange to say the least. > > Trademarks are more expensive to obtain. > But and this is the killer ... using the usual application process they take at least a year to get ..... > The chair of the 30-person panel, Swinburne University academic Mr Derek > Whitehead, said its most controversial proposal was to get rid of a ban on > generic names. This would allow the likes of sydney.com.au to be registered. > But you can't trademark generic words so suggestion above and this one are mutually exclusive are they? > But Mr Whitehead said no final decision would be made until a meeting on > December 12. > What power has this panel to implement any of this? regards doug ----------------------------------------------------------- Doug Robb Clarity Software Pty Ltd http://clarity.com.au GPO Box 763 Phone: 0403 02 2527 Nedlands 6909 Fax: (618) 93867564 Australia email: doug§clarity.com.au -----------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Nov 20 2000 - 11:38:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC