>Can I use then navigational co-ordinates of my house? I just want to see how >many people are going to remember john§Long.21.23.N.Lat.37.25.W.au Great concept - make your email address dependent on your physical home address. Yep, that'll work [as long as none of us ever move house] :) I made a suggestion, with some other supporters (quite formally to my best guess at 'the powers the be' at the time - Robert Elz), some years ago, about establishing 'acn.au', whose domain naming rules were that the only allowed entries at the third level consisted of your company ACN number. It would provide a guaranteed slot in the DNS system for every Australian registered company (with no arguments since the arbitration is done for you by side effect by the ASIC allocation process). It would have given the ASIC a whole new business in acting as a portal for the location of Australian web sites based on their company name :) A similar concept would be to have <registration-number>.<state>.ARBN.AU for Australian registered business names. My proposal didn't even get dignified with a response, which I took as a 'no' :) Unfortunately all of these nice notions suffer from the thing that blows away everything except putting your name in '.COM' - which is that this location simply has the best commercial visibility, in the DNS system, and every day, in every way, hugely powerful media empires are promoting 'DotCom' as the only place to be (and by inherited psychological side effect, .COM.AU in Australia). So the problem (commercially at least) is that YOUR customers are expecting to 'find' you in their web browser URL window by typing your company name and slapping .COM on the back of it. That simple truth is the major environmental factor we all have to deal with. We all know the truth - that in marketing terms, we can talk all day about rational places to add various names into the DNS, but for any sort of commercial usage, the most sexy place to have your domain name is in .COM or .COM.AU. This is why InterNic and INWW are rich, and getting very much richer each day - because in the Internet gold rush, the ones that are guaranteed to make money are the people who sell shovels (whether or not the shovel purchasers strike gold in turn). The thing about domain names on the Internet is that with very minor exceptions, in technical terms, one domain name is just as technically useful to you (for business or personal purposes) as any other - just as long as it remains a stable vector for people to 'find' you. The secondary (technical) issue, which is whether that name can be easily guessed or remembered, has become the primary money-making and mind-set issue, of course. The only ultimate cure is a real directory system for locating entities on the Internet, which takes search criteria and resolves them seamlessly to (the correct) current domain name for 'you'. There have been, and continue to be, many attempts to build such a thing - literally starting with the venerable X.500 (remember that?), continuing with the current trend to use generalised web search engines to approximate this outcome, and into efforts like 'realnames' (which you can find, of couse, at www.realnames.com, and which appears to be automagically supported by MSIE) Maybe one of them will get critical mass. Realnames, given that it's built into MSIE, might have a good chance of making an impact in mind-share terms. Then again, like many other things in the world (for instance, which side of the road cars are built to be driven on), someone's always going to want to do it 'their way', and re-open an un-winnable argument about whether their way (or their domain name, or whatever) is 'better' than some other one. Gotta love it. Simon --- Simon Hackett, Technical Director, Internode Systems Pty Ltd 31 York St [PO Box 284, Rundle Mall], Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia Email: simon§internode.com.au Web: http://www.on.net Phone: +61-8-8223-2999 Fax: +61-8-8223-1777Received on Wed Feb 02 2000 - 06:41:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC