Have a look at www.tldns.com Cheers Daniel -----Original Message----- From: George Michaelson [mailto:ggm§dstc.edu.au] Sent: Tuesday, 1 February 2000 10:35 AM To: dns§waia.asn.au Subject: Re: [DNS] ABC: Australia supports global cyber-squatting regulations People want to be able to have tom.smith§tim-smith.something-relevant and emu, cows, bunnies and whatever else is under .id.au does not seem all that relevant to me. Gateway find cows works well for them as a branding. So do tucows. Playboy never found the bunny image a problem. But lets assume you're right, and this current id.au is failing because people don't like the animals and not because so few ISP's support id.au, or the mechanisms to make mail delivery work are charged for too highly, or any of 100 other reasons uptake may be slight [and I could also suggest that vanity domain names have less value than people think] Fine. Find a neutral non-value laden namepoint (actually a large set of namepoints). Implement a method for managing John.Smith§smiths.something-relevant which scales for 1000+ John Smiths. If it involves auctioning off the nicer ones to rich people, you fail. If it involves one John Smith running it for all other smiths, you fail. If it excludes any John Smith who is an Australian citizen, you fail. If it excludes visiting overseas John Smiths, you fail. Explain how people know that the John.Smith§something-relevant is the one they want, from 1000 others. In your answer explain how the DNS is going to provide the searching function, and the referall and chained query functions required for this (C/F X.500) Explain how this is going to be deployed under state competitive and federal guidelines. Who sets the charges. Who determines which names are acceptable. Who proves authorititive content. Explain how the competing interests adjudicate an outcome for the wider community. Explain how it helps locate people who ARE NOT UNDER smith.something.relevant, but are useful, online, and being sought in this supposedly global directory service. I do not know the answer with respect to id.au but do you honestly think that a TLD space that you share with furry creatures is suitable ? Given user§ihug.co.nz, I can't see whats objectionable about banksia.com.au (a flower) or dingoblue.com.au (an animal) so please, whats the issue here? that the animal and plant is under id.au makes it 'less worthy' ? Oh please. > I'm waiting... At least Vic has the get-go to challenge this technocrat heavy list - well done Vic. Vic isn't challenging a 'technocrat heavy list' - Vic is technologically challanged. My mother had a few wise sayings, in between her habit of whistling Mozart loudly in the kitchen and drinking beer. Here is one of them: "Want" shall be your master. People don't always get what they want. Frankly, judging by the traffic on this list, We won't even get what we deserve. cheers -George -- George Michaelson | DSTC Pty Ltd Email: ggm§dstc.edu.au | University of Qld 4072 Phone: +61 7 3365 4310 | Australia Fax: +61 7 3365 4311 | http://www.dstc.edu.au -- This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without express permission of the author. You don't know who really wrote it. 272 subscribers. Archived at http://lists.waia.asn.au/list/dns (dns/dns) Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§waia.asn.au to be removed.Received on Tue Feb 01 2000 - 09:22:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC