Again, I pose the question to the readers. Is the aim of this discussion
group to think of what to do with *.id.au ?
If it is the notion of making it a more active domain then 'yes' it is
important as to what the 'XYZ' in XYZ.id.au actually is, rather than
arbitraryString.id.au
There is always the way of cutting the domain into areas: be it postcode or
state levels.

Rohan


At 11:42 PM 31/01/00 +1100, you wrote:
>At 10:09 PM +1100 31/1/2000, Nick Andrew wrote:
>>No doubt cooler names are waiting to be delegated, as soon as somebody
>>thinks of them. From my point of view, an id.au sub domain just isn't very
>>attractive while the parent components are so, well, nondescript.
>
>So what? MyName.arbitraryString.id.au gets MyName in. The rest is fairy
>floss. The DNS is not X500.
>
>Tony
>
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>phone  +61 2 6241 7659
>mailto:me§Tony-Barry.emu.id.au
>http://purl.oclc.org/NET/Tony.Barry
>
>
>--
>This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
>express permission of the author.  You don't know who really wrote it.
>272 subscribers. Archived at http://lists.waia.asn.au/list/dns (dns/dns)
>Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§waia.asn.au to be removed.
>
>
>