] >The biggest pressure I can see for this year is that at least one ] >monopoly commercial DNA will likely be requesting/demanding in a ] >few months time, that registrants pay significant amounts of money ] >just to continue holding their domains. ] ] Whilst there may be some perceived advantage to registering in the com.au ] domain, the .com is easier to deal with, cheaper, and quicker. I'm not talking about new registrations in this thread, I'm talking about existing domain names (those more than 1.5 years old now). Changing domain names is a very considerable pain which means there is strong pressure to keep the same domain name you had before. If I had been talking about new registrations, then the fact that its hard to find an unallocated name that you want in com would have been relevant. For anyone who asks "what's wrong with .com?", I invite you to find a table of the percentage of 2/3/4/5-letter .com domains available and compare that with com.au domains available. I won't be at all surprised when you find there are *much* fewer .com domains left. If DNS is like real estate, then the com gTLD feels "over-crowded". ] Do we really want a system that is either that difficulty to deal with in ] terms of red tape, or expensive that the .com.au domain is just by passed? I certainly want to see the cost of com.au domains reduced (particularly renewals). That's why I wrote the paragraph at the top of this message. __________________________________________________________________________ David Keegel <djk§cyber.com.au> URL: http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/ Cybersource P/L: Unix Systems Administration and TCP/IP network managementReceived on Wed Jul 14 1999 - 21:52:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC