Was this time extended?


PO,

Narelle

Leni Mayo wrote:

> [ Apologies for the reposting]
>
> Hi Glen -
>
> Iain Morrison (cc'ed to this message) is probably best qualified to
> respond
> to your concerns re: .edu.au and csiro.au.  He represents AVCC and
> CSIRO on
> the AU WG (http://au.moniker.net/site_doc/wg_members.html).  I've also
> cc'ed
> your comments to au-wg-submit§moniker.net as some members of the AU WG
> are
> not on the dns list.
>
> Re: the timetable, I agree that end of Jan as the closing of the
> public
> comment period is pretty close.  Perhaps that can be extended
> somewhat, I'm
> not it a position to say but I can raise it at the next teleconf 13
> Jan.
> Someone should write a coherent explanation of the timeframe as the
> same
> question arose on the link list.  Have you got any specific
> organisations in
> mind that will be unable to formally comment because of the timeframe?
>
> Leni.
>
> Glen Turner wrote:
>
> > Hi Leni,
> >
> > I'm sure it's just an oversight, but
> >
> > > Members
> > >
> > > 1.Members may be companies, individuals, or associations of
> > >   companies or individuals.
> >
> > excludes both .gov.au (including csiro.au) and .edu.au from
> > effective representation.  I suggest that adding bodies established
> > by Act or regulation of an Australian government, and associations
> > of those bodies, to the list.
> >
> > I'd also like to object to the period of time for comment.
> > Many government organisations and community concerns
> > have regular monthly meetings that consider and decide policy
> > and the proposed timetime does not allow consideration by
> > those policy-setting bodies.  Some of these bodies have
> > constitutional provisions about the length of notice required
> > for a non-scheduled Extraordinary Meeting.

--
Narelle Clark                                   ph: +612 9342 6503
Technical Specialist                           fax: +612 9342 7766
Technology & Planning
Optus Communications                         narellec§optus.com.au