At 1:27 AM 1998/06/29, David Keegel wrote:
>So, let's start with com.au, and tackle any issues we need to along
>the way, identify any other issues so that we can come back to them
>after we have sorted out com.au and net.au (and any similar domains).
>

No lets not. Start with .au

Get the top level right first THEN worry about what seems to be an
imbroglio in ocm.au


>] How should the .au DNS be governed? What is an appropriate body to do it?
>
>For the next year or two, I can't see why kre can't keep governing .au
>itself, mainly in a "caretaker" capacity (that's all it needs).

I'm sure he can but if we don't fix the long term principles and strategies
for .au we might find the something we do about com.au conflicts, Get it
right at the top and then follow policy and principle down

>
>Once we've sorted out com.au, we will probably be in a better position to
>answer those sorts of questions than we are now.  In the process, we will
>likely learn a lot more about other stake-holders, to help things along.

No. Other stakeholders have sorted out their domains already. LEarn from
them now.


Tony

_______________________________________________________
   mailto:tonyb§netinfo.com.au      | Ningaui Pty Ltd
  mailto:me§Tony-Barry.emu.id.au    |   GPO Box 1680
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/Tony.Barry | Canberra ACT 2601
      Phone +61 4 1242 0397         |     AUSTRALIA