On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Simon Hackett wrote: > I think that Rick's notion of criticising people for allowing subdomains of > domain spaces that they control to be delegated to others is rather a > strange one, given that the entire internet DNS works that way! Stranger things have been said on the net, Simon ;) Seriously, I agree the DNS works in a hierarchical fashion, but keep in mind that a domain name ultimately refers to a host. What occurs between the host name and the root TLD is what is being considered by this thread. I still submit that the moment the domain name 'leaves' the sanctioned root authority somewhere along it's hierarchical path, we are out of the "delegation and onselling" arena and into the "user or customer" arena. Example: www.dot.net.au is our main web server It would be inappropriate and downright idiotic for Dot Communications to onsell domains piggy backed to the above, e.g. tieshop.www.dot.net.au this is silly Let's move back up one level in the hierarchy. dot.net.au is our root domain for our company Once again, onselling domains in this domain is a bit naf. e.g. tieshop.dot.net.au not too portable! if tieshop moves to OzEmail, they are screwed BTW: You see a lot of the above nonsense happening on the Internet, but strangely, only in the commercial areas ;-) If there is a fast buck to be made ... that doesn't give the product or technique any more validity. Finally, moving back up the hierarchy once more, we arrive at the 2LD managed by connect.com.au: net.au fine ... delegate subdomains and have fun! This is because .net.au is INTENDED and SANCTION for this purpose. Thus, it is simplistic and glib to say the entire DNS particpates in this hierarchical process and thus all delegations at any level have equal validity. There are semantics and rules to each level in the DNS ... it is not an unamanged open slather. Regards, R Welykochy Dot Communications LtdReceived on Fri Jun 19 1998 - 13:21:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC