Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Adam Todd <at§ah.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 15:15:08 +1000

>In short, the point is that aust.com is not separated from other OzEmail
>business, and thus aust.com domains are apparently not portable, in
>contrast with aus.com, au.com, com.au, com, where they don't care who
>your nameservers are or who your ISP is.

you left out:

INOZ.COM  and *.AUS

Received on Fri Jun 19 1998 - 16:15:23 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Clive: "Re: DNS: defining "official" domains"
Previous message: vicc§cia.net.au: "Re: DNS: defining "official" domains"
In reply to: David Keegel: "Re: DNS: defining "official" domains"
Next in thread: Clive: "Re: DNS: defining "official" domains"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC