>Anyway, I never got around to running it, but your post reminded me. So >here are the results.. > >Providers that returned records for "www.ah.net", but not "www.au.rsc": 591 >Providers that returned records for "www.au.rsc": 4 >Providers that returned records for the domain they are authoritative > for, but not for "www.ah.net", "www.au.rsc" (presumably don't forward): 13 >Providers whom I got no response from (timed out, etc.): 17 Would it not have been more conclusive to query not a domain name, bit the root record SOA, thus looking for the difference between RS2.AURSC.AH.NET, the ALTERNIC server or the Legacy Server. You might find your results are far more rewarding. >FTR, here are the nameservers that knew www.au.rsc: > central.cth.com.au (1) [Closer To Home Systems: Nambour-QLD, Caboolture-QLD] > nhj.nlc.net.au (1) [NLC: Terrey_Hills/Sydney-NSW] > saturn.thepla.net (1) [CyberGate PlaNet: Sydney-NSW] > gecko.znet.net.au (1) [Zed.Net: Silkwood-QLD, Innisfail-QLD] But since you draw this much: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Current Servers who have requested data from AURSC that we answered Up to Sat Jun 20 23:59:58 1998 on rs1.aursc.ah.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ IP Address Host Name Answers Given ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 1066078 203.29.208.1 baygate.cth.com.au 4177 203.29.208.10 central.cth.com.au 232 203.37.232.130 proxy.znet.net.au 349 203.61.202.5 mail.znet.net.au 613 Now see you show Geko.znet.net.au, but I don't even have that listed in my reports. A clear indication that you are looking at the WRONG servers. 203.24.133.1 nhj.nlc.net.au 8202 203.24.133.4 monster.nlc.net.au 12 And again, you only list ONE of the nlc servers, there are two making queries. 203.32.190.1 Saturn.ThePla.Net 13672 203.32.190.3 Mercury.ThePla.Net 2046 203.32.190.243 Aurora.ThePla.Net 1 Just the report alone on ThePla.Net clearly shows your report as high with errors. You must remember that a "listed" DNS server for providing resolution to the PUBLIC INTENET is not necessarily the resolving DNS server used by the clients of that site. A DNS server itself can, by using the /etc/resolve.conf file use another DNS server to gain it's answers and thus not be a forwarder, caching server or anything else. You again, show your extremely limited understanding of DNS servers. You will find that my DNS servers, alone work in this fashion where data is served from a set of servers, but clients use another set for caching. <sigh> Kim, thanks for showing yet again how abismally educated the average Australian ISP is. You missed locating the other 2 pages of AU based ISPs. But I'll allow you the benfit of the doubt because you are just so keen to discredit something YOU ARE NOT USING AT ALL. Incidently I have a slightly more sophisticated application. It tells me what Root Server network is in use, it can even detect GRS users. Betchay can't do that :) You probably don't even know what GRS is either :( So: SHUT UP AND STOP TALKING ABOUT AURSC. Unless you use it, then I'm happy for you. Oh and yet again for the record: It's not always the ISP who is using AURSC, some users are just a little more intelligent than the ISP. 203.36.35.27 dialup-8.melb.ozramp.com.au 7 203.36.35.28 dialup-9.melb.ozramp.com.au 7 203.36.35.48 dialup-29.melb.ozramp.com.au 5 203.36.35.65 dialup-46.melb.ozramp.com.au 3 203.36.35.72 dialup-53.melb.ozramp.com.au 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Current Servers who have requested data from AURSC that we answered Up to Sat Jun 20 23:59:58 1998 on rs1.aursc.ah.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ IP Address Host Name Answers Given ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 203.36.35.75 dialup-56.melb.ozramp.com.au 2 203.36.35.83 dialup-64.melb.ozramp.com.au 4 203.36.35.108 dialup-89.melb.ozramp.com.au 6 203.36.35.131 dialup-112.melb.ozramp.com.au 1 203.36.35.139 dialup-120.melb.ozramp.com.au 1 203.36.35.156 dialup-137.melb.ozramp.com.au 3 203.36.35.158 dialup-139.melb.ozramp.com.au 2 203.36.35.179 dialup-160.melb.ozramp.com.au 1 203.36.35.191 dialup-172.melb.ozramp.com.au 1 203.36.35.206 dialup-187.melb.ozramp.com.au 1 Even this one is interesting: 202.188.7.7 klj-7-7.tm.net.my 1 202.188.7.50 klj-7-50.tm.net.my 2 202.188.7.121 klj-7-121.tm.net.my 7 202.188.7.123 klj-7-123.tm.net.my 1 202.188.18.212 klj-18-212.tm.net.my 1 202.188.19.55 klj-19-55.tm.net.my 6 202.188.19.243 klj-19-243.tm.net.my 4 202.188.20.59 klj-20-59.tm.net.my 1 202.188.20.98 klj-20-98.tm.net.my 1 202.188.20.218 klj-20-218.tm.net.my 1 202.188.41.3 klg-41-3.tm.net.my 1 202.188.41.35 klg-41-35.tm.net.my 1 202.188.41.201 klg-41-201.tm.net.my 1 202.188.56.17 klg-56-17.tm.net.my 1 202.188.56.47 klg-56-47.tm.net.my 1 202.188.56.63 klg-56-63.tm.net.my 1 202.188.56.73 klg-56-73.tm.net.my 1 202.188.56.160 klg-56-160.tm.net.my 1 202.188.57.52 klg-57-52.tm.net.my 1 202.188.57.126 klg-57-126.tm.net.my 3 202.188.57.197 klg-57-197.tm.net.my 2 202.188.57.214 klg-57-214.tm.net.my 1 202.188.58.6 klg-58-6.tm.net.my 1 202.188.58.61 klg-58-61.tm.net.my 1 202.188.59.147 klg-59-147.tm.net.my 1 202.188.59.215 klg-59-215.tm.net.my 2 202.188.59.233 klg-59-233.tm.net.my 6 >Draw whatever conclusions you will, but personally I find it hard to >believe there is anything but a trivial amount of use of AURSC in relation >to the number of people using the Internet in Australia. Well your still about 45 ISPs short of producing a list. I'm so pleased you found time to waste your bandwidth and that of the ISPs. I'll tell you what. I'll produce the full list, but I want everyone on this mail list to send me a signed document, with a company seal stating they will not infringe, make further comment about (without my writen authority), make statements of/about/to, or harass any of the users/isps using AURSC. Add in a breach clause indicating you will surrender $100,000 in CASH upon such breach. That's pretty fair. Then when you break that agreement I'll sue the pant off you. Then I'll have some (bloody little really) cnofidence in you, and, I'll produce the list.Received on Sun Jun 21 1998 - 13:47:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC