At 16:13 +1000 25/6/98, Larry Bloch wrote: >I am opposed to a shared registry system. I don't believe that this is the >wayto go because in the end what you have is a CORE style organisation in >the middle. >... And the proposed alternative: >Level 1: AU-NOMINET >Level 2: Any ISP wanting to be a COM.AU registrar >Level 3: End Buyers This model still requires a shared registry system. The multiple Level 2 operators share the registry operated by AU-NOMINET. In this model, MelbourneIT would become a level 2 operator. If AU-NOMINET is responsible for .AU and operates registry software for all 2LDs, this becomes a very elegant and efficient solution. Operating the SRS is a purely technical operation, similar to the operation of the current databases by AUNIC. ...Richard.Received on Fri Jun 26 1998 - 13:22:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC