As the owner of a so-called "historical and unserviced" domain, I had hoped that there would be some competition by now. Melbourne IT's actions regarding historical domains reflect it's bureaucratic culture, academic origins and monopoly position. I will never voluntarily pay money to this rapacious bunch of twits. The fact that INTIAA and ISOC-AU consented to M-IT's organised plunder does those organisations no credit, either. Andrew Donald -----Original Message----- From: Kim Davies <kim§ii.net> To: dns§intiaa.asn.au <dns§intiaa.asn.au> Date: Thursday, 9 October 1997 18:16 Subject: Re: DNS: Don Heath proposes using the $50mil NSF pool to fund IAHC ><snip> >I do agree this stagnation of the domain issue is not a good >sign. Melbourne IT pushed back it's deletion of historical >com.au domains due to that controversy at the start of the >year, but according to > > http://www.melbourneit.com.au/com_au/renewals/contents/\ > renewals-update.html > >those domains that weren't paid for by yesterday now have 21 >days before their air supply is cut. ><snip>Received on Fri Oct 10 1997 - 00:53:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC