At 10:01 4/08/97 +0800, you wrote: > >> Actually I tend to think the opposite, let's just stick to the criteria for >> the commercial domains which will be ADNA's initial focus. We don't know >> what other kinds of domains (if any) ADNA will take over but obviously the >> issues would many and varied and now is not the time to tackle them. > >Then I'd tend to agree with David's suggestion. Let's >be blunt and label them specifically "COM.AU Criteria". >Its easy to add "and OTHERCOMMERCIALTHING.AU" later. > >MM > OK - I don't recollect David's suggestion but I am happy to declare that what we are working on here to be the "Selection criteria for new DNA and 2LDs for commercial domains". I would also suggest that we can now progress on the basis that *all* such new DNAs will deal with *all* the initial ADNA 2LDs be they existing or new as they (the domains) will all be commercially based. Any objections? Regards -- Kevin Dinn ____________________ o _ _--_|\ ZIP P/L Business Manager /____|___|_)________/______\_____________ www.zip.com.au | . \_.--._/ Virtually Phone: (Australia) 02 92 704 777 Fax: 92 475 276 v the best :-) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... (soon to be ex) President - Australian Internet Alliance (www.aia.asn.au) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...Received on Mon Aug 04 1997 - 13:29:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC