Quoting Kevin Dinn: | | Now we know how much Leni has in the bank! :-) I really don't know what to | do about this 5 employee thing. I make it 5, everybody says 1, I make it 1, | people say 5. Could people who care just express their opinion and I will | go with the majority. I guess the answer is - you can't set the 'right' amount of employees for a DNA to have, because it varies depending on their workload. NET.AU probably requires less staff than COM.AU, and certainly from personal experience as 'vice DNA', ASN.AU is something someone can easily do in their spare time. Of course, if you're talking number of employees being a barrier for entry into DNA selection, then 5 is going to get less applicants than 1. kimReceived on Thu Jul 24 1997 - 10:02:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC