] > ADNA should stick to .COM.AU.
] 
] No.  You were pretty close up to this point.  ADNA is not, and was
] never intended to be, a body to keep an eye on Melbourne IT.  COM.AU
] is certainly the area that attracts most attention, and should be
] ADNA's focus.  If competition is the appropriate response, then a
] recommendation of this should be presented to Melbourne IT. Even then,
] M-IT will need to be satisfied that the framework is workable.

I thought the point of ADNA in the short term was to open up com.au
to competition by having multiple DNAs maintaining com.au.  Obviously
Melbourne IT would be expected to be one of the DNAs for com.au, but
the organisations which proposed to set up biz.au would probably also
want to be DNAs for com.au as well.
 
Is this what ADNA is wanting to do, or is it going for the old
fashioned "one domain -> one DNA" approach?
__________________________________________________________________________
David Keegel <djk&#167;cyber.com.au>  http://www.cyber.com.au/  +61 3 9642-5997
Cybersource P/L: Unix Systems Administration and TCP/IP network management