cc list pruned again No - it still sounds shocking as a first cut. "We need more SLDs - because we need more SLDs?" What problem do you think you might possibly be addressing Simon? And is this a solution? "We need to manage competition" Huh? Is this the New Age form of "managed" competition? What do you mean by competition, and how do you expect to achieve it? As a first cut there are gaping holes as far as I can see Simon. I'm sorry, but the deja vue with the IAHC work is overwhelming, and my point is that a little better effort in understanding the problem domain rather than pontificating bandaids will go a long way forward. Geoff At 07:20 PM 15/5/97 +1000, Nick Andrew wrote: >Forwarding a message from Simon Hackett: >> I would see this working by ADNA directly managing processes of competition >> in com.au, and by ADNA vetting applications for <newname>.au, and once it's >> happy, handling those names to Robert for approval as (still) the authority >> in .AU, with the understanding that he'll normally say yes as long as ADNA >> have already agreed that the new namespace is ok, unless he has a serious >> objection - in which case, he wins. > >Sounds good as a first cut. > >Nick. >-- >Kralizec / Zeta Microcomputer Software Fax: +61-2-9233-6545 Voice: 9837-1397 >G.P.O. Box 3400, Sydney NSW 1043 http://www.zeta.org.au/ > > > -- Geoff Huston gih§telstra.net Network Technical Manager +61 6 208 1908 Telstra Internet Locked Bag 5744, Canberra ACT 2601Received on Fri May 16 1997 - 12:33:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC